Personal Thoughts on the movie “Tangled”
If you grew up watching Disney movies like
Cinderella or Disney shows like Hannah Montana or Lizzie McGuire, you will
probably have watched Tangled at least once. Tangled is definitely my favorite
Disney princess movie up till now. As most of you will know it’s a remake of
the classic
fairytale Rapunzel. The story is somewhat different
though.
In the original story, a pregnant woman and her husband steal some vegetables from a witch’s garden. When caught, they promise to give up their baby to the witch. The witch then locks up the girl in a tower and keeps her there. Now, this story is pretty lame. The only reason the witch keeps the girl is purely out of revenge for the vegetable thieves. That witch should’ve missed those veggies a lot; she even names the girl after them-“Rapunzel”. WHO names a kid after a VEGETABLE?
In the original story, a pregnant woman and her husband steal some vegetables from a witch’s garden. When caught, they promise to give up their baby to the witch. The witch then locks up the girl in a tower and keeps her there. Now, this story is pretty lame. The only reason the witch keeps the girl is purely out of revenge for the vegetable thieves. That witch should’ve missed those veggies a lot; she even names the girl after them-“Rapunzel”. WHO names a kid after a VEGETABLE?
What makes this story even more lame is that it’s
the typical “prince saves tragic beauty from danger” story. Rapunzel, being the
stupid girl she is, has no desire to leave the tower at all until a prince
“somehow” passes by and discovers her. Falling in love with someone she just
met and trusting that person with all her heart, Rapunzel would make a terrible
feminist. (On the other hand, our Disney princess Rapunzel seems to be the model
of feminism)
Now, the Disney version of the story makes so much
more sense. Well, of course the part about the magical flower growing from a
“drop of sunlight”? No. That just doesn’t happen. But since the story is
fiction anyways let’s just ignore that.
So, moving on, in this version the witch, Mother
Gothel, actually has a reason to kidnap the girl. Her hair has the same power
as the “magic golden flower”, which makes a person young again if they sing a
creepy song about a shining flower. Because Gothel is obsessed with youth and beauty
she locks Rapunzel up and raises her as her own child.
Rapunzel in this story actually does have a desire
to leave the tower, to see the “floating lights”. Not a really good reason, and
she still only feels the want to leave once a year. She’s probably a sociopath.
The only other person she’s ever met is her “mother”, and the only friend she
has is the chameleon Pascal (She can talk to animals, apparently.). Isn’t it
normal to get tired of that life in a few years? Oh well, at least she tried
harder than the older version of herself.
Another point that’s different is
that Flynn Rider, the main guy character, isn’t a prince. He wasn’t even
looking for Rapunzel! She has to beg him to take her to see the floating
lanterns(when she was okay with not going outside for the last 18 years…?)
Flynn at first sees her as a nuisance, unlike the fairytale prince who
immediately falls in love with the girl he just met after climbing up her hair.
But eventually he falls in love with her(What are the odds?) Admittedly Flynn
is one of the main reasons I like this movie so much. I mean, look at that
face. Who can resist that “smoulder”?
Growing up with Disney films, Disney remakes of
classic fairytales are always fun to watch. Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, and Beauty
and the Beast were all great remakes that stuck to the storyline of the
original version(although some with happier
endings). However Tangled was one that broke away from its original and created
a totally different story. And I must say, this was a great move on Disney’s
part. While I made fun and nitpicked the flaws of the movie, I definitely
recommend it to those who haven’t seen it yet.







No comments:
Post a Comment